Hi Sergio,
You can do either but I suggest using StarCluster to launch the instance
to be customized/imaged. The process is fully documented here:
http://web.mit.edu/star/cluster/docs/latest/manual/create_new_ami.html#launching-a-new-image-host
HTH,
~Justin
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 01:44:08PM -0300, Sergio Mafra wrote:
> Dear friends,
> If I would like to customize an AMI to serve as model to all my
> StarCluster configurations (launch, add node, remove node, ELB cluster..
> etc). To do this, should I:
> a) choose an AMI supported, launch StarCluster, do all the customizations,
> create a new AMI.. done.
> b) choose an AMI supported, do all customizations, create a new AMI,
> launch StarCluster.. done
> Option a) seems to be more reasonable due the possibility to do all tests
> with the desired configuration but I´ve read somewhere that you should go
> using b) option.
> What do you recommend?
> Best Regards,
> Sergio
> _______________________________________________
> StarCluster mailing list
> StarCluster_at_mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/starcluster
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
Received on Tue Jul 31 2012 - 19:04:51 EDT
This archive was generated by
hypermail 2.3.0.