Hi Rayson,
Let me first say thanks for OGS, its a super useful tool!
So, an update....
I realized that the parameter was load_report_time in the global
configuration.
The delay was basically exactly load_report_time, and so I have set it to
0, and the delay is basically gone...
Rayson, here is my global configuration (qconf -sconf), any comments?
Particularly, is it okay to have a value of zero for load_report_time?
$ qconf -sconf
#global:
execd_spool_dir /opt/sge6/default/spool
mailer /bin/mail
xterm /usr/bin/X11/xterm
load_sensor none
prolog none
epilog none
shell_start_mode posix_compliant
login_shells sh,bash,ksh,csh,tcsh
min_uid 0
min_gid 0
user_lists none
xuser_lists none
projects none
xprojects none
enforce_project false
enforce_user auto
load_report_time 00:00:00
max_unheard 00:05:00
reschedule_unknown 02:00:00
loglevel log_warning
administrator_mail none_at_none.edu
set_token_cmd none
pag_cmd none
token_extend_time none
shepherd_cmd none
qmaster_params none
execd_params none
reporting_params accounting=false reporting=false \
flush_time=00:00:15 joblog=false
sharelog=00:00:00
finished_jobs 100
gid_range 20000-20100
qlogin_command builtin
qlogin_daemon builtin
rlogin_command builtin
rlogin_daemon builtin
rsh_command builtin
rsh_daemon builtin
max_aj_instances 2000
max_aj_tasks 75000
max_u_jobs 0
max_jobs 0
max_advance_reservations 0
auto_user_oticket 0
auto_user_fshare 0
auto_user_default_project none
auto_user_delete_time 86400
delegated_file_staging false
reprioritize 0
jsv_url none
jsv_allowed_mod ac,h,i,e,o,j,M,N,p,w
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Rayson Ho <raysonlogin_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Jesse Lu <jesselu_at_stanford.edu> wrote:
> > However, if I run in a parallel environment (e.g. qsub -pe orte ...) then
> > there is an approximately 40 sec delay after job completion. That is to
> say,
> > the job has technically finished, although qstat still lists it as
> running,
> > and subsequent jobs are held up. Any ideas?
>
> That's fixed in the update release.
>
> Rayson
>
> ==================================================
> Open Grid Scheduler - The Official Open Source Grid Engine
> http://gridscheduler.sourceforge.net/
>
>
> >
> > Thanks in advance!
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Rayson Ho <raysonlogin_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> That's the default scheduling time, and if you really want the
> >> scheduler to react to your qsub requests ASAP, you can turn on
> >> "scheduling-on-demand":
> >>
> >> http://gridscheduler.sourceforge.net/howto/tuning.html
> >>
> >> And in OGS/GE 2011.11 u1 p1 (we need a better name), the time it takes
> >> to report job done should be reduced.
> >>
> >> Rayson
> >>
> >> ==================================================
> >> Open Grid Scheduler - The Official Open Source Grid Engine
> >> http://gridscheduler.sourceforge.net/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 8:05 PM, Jesse Lu <mr.jesselu_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Yes! Exactly.
> >> >
> >> > -- Jesse
> >> > ________________________________
> >> > On Sep 4, 2012 4:19 PM, Rayson Ho <raysonlogin_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hi Jesse,
> >> >
> >> > Are you referring to the scheduling time of Grid Engine??
> >> >
> >> > Rayson
> >> >
> >> > ==================================================
> >> > Open Grid Scheduler - The Official Open Source Grid Engine
> >> > http://gridscheduler.sourceforge.net/
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Jesse Lu <jesselu_at_stanford.edu>
> wrote:
> >> >> Hi StarCluster users,
> >> >>
> >> >> I've noticed long delays with Sun Grid Engine when submitting jobs
> and
> >> >> especially after job execution. Even running a simple "hostname" job
> >> >> takes
> >> >> several seconds. Moreover, running an MPI version of "hostname" can
> >> >> take 2
> >> >> minutes!!
> >> >>
> >> >> Can someone help me get rid of this delay? Thank you.
> >> >>
> >> >> Jesse
> >> >>
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> StarCluster mailing list
> >> >> StarCluster_at_mit.edu
> >> >> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/starcluster
> >> >>
> >
> >
>
Received on Wed Sep 05 2012 - 19:32:53 EDT